Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain

Fair enough. :~)

I think from the standpoint of protecting the best interests of the horses used in sport, that’s definitely the strongest statement they could have made.


9 posted on 07/23/2007 2:24:27 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: HairOfTheDog

Exactly, and I believe erring (altho I don’t think it would have been an error in this case) on the side of the horses is in the best interest of the horses and the sport. When animals are at the mercy of handlers, the doubt should go to the animal, because they have no voice of their own, especially when they are dead.

Becky


10 posted on 07/23/2007 3:00:15 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson