Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void
As I see it, at least from what I read from the last book and, if the author doesn’t do a turn around, Snape will turn out to be the bad guy and probably killed in the end.

She set him up to be Dumbledore’s good guy in the first story but turns out to be bad at the end.

The only thing I don’t like is having Dumbledore’s quality of giving people a second chance and his good nature being destroyed by Snape. At least Jesus knew and said that Judas would betray him. I know this makes for good reading but I can’t help but shiver at the message it sends to kids.

But this is all pie in sky until the last book comes out and puts it all to rest... At least I hope it does.

167 posted on 07/11/2007 6:43:02 PM PDT by dragonblustar (Viking Kitties Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: dragonblustar
One big difference is that without Judas there would be no Chrisianity.

The wizarding world doesn't require the death of Dumbledore to exist or continue existing.

The only thing I don’t like is having Dumbledore’s quality of giving people a second chance and his good nature being destroyed by Snape.

I don't think it was. It was a measure of Dumbledore's belief in redemption that he was willing to die to give another the slim hope of salvation.

168 posted on 07/11/2007 6:52:06 PM PDT by null and void (...and there'd be world peace and fuzzy puppies for everyone. And then we could eat them...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson