To: Monkey Face; SandyInSeattle
>That's different. It's the whitish glare from the sky that I really hate.
This is like a double whammy. It happens with the morning commute, for those going east, and in the afternoon, it's much worse for those going west.
The sun glare of the hood of the car, and the reflection off the pavement causes LOTS of accidents, and even if you're walking into the sun, it is hazardous.
It's not so bad in winter, of course, because of the sun's position, but from April through October, you literally take your life in your hands if you have to drive toward the sun. Glare reflected from hot pavement is one thing; that's why I insist upon having polarized sunglasses.
Glare from driving directly into the sun is another. I experienced that too much ("too much" can be defined as "at least once") when at school in Santa Barbara and working in Carpinteria, CA. Highway 101 leads directly into the sun too often there.
But the whitish glare is something completely different. If I don't don my (Polaroid) sunglasses, I will get a headache from it. And I don't recall encountering it so much from your near-equatorial climes as I do in Seattle. *\B-)
1,838 posted on
07/18/2007 5:17:15 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: sionnsar
I couldn’t function without polarized sunglasses. I like the “yellow” ones because they cut the blue rays, which is the cause of most of the glare.
(Part of McCarran IA has lost it’s power, and Nevada Power is hot after the problem. Or something...)
1,843 posted on
07/18/2007 5:21:28 PM PDT by
Monkey Face
("Equal opportunity" means everyone will have a fair chance at being incompetent. ~~ L J Pete)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson