[nicmarlo]

No, it’s like all you bring up is Corsi.

I didn’t. I mentioned that ALL the threads on the NAU are always moved to chat.....you all started in with the “Corsi” smears, once again.

If you can’t argue soundly, that’s the Clinton way....smear.

[1rudeboy]

Observing that Corsi disguises circumstantial evidence as dispositive evidence is not a smear. Calling him a charlatan is. I do both.

I suspect that once someone finds some evidence, then it will be news. Big news. [chuckle]