[nicmarlo]

So quit your pathetic "you just won't read it" BS. It's amateur sophistry.

It is pathetic...you refused to last time I posted them, yet you had the same "arguments" then, when you were still refusing to inform yourself.

Reading the SPP, or Corsi's articles, by themselves, without reading the other documents, is not informing yourself. It's pathetic that you think I should place any weight on someone's personal uninformed opinions.

[1rudeboy]

So in other words, you don't have to make an argument because you claim your opponent refuses to read the argument you've made in the past. Cute.

It's like pressing the rhetorical Easy Button.

[1rudeboy]

Let me ask you this: do you consider the “article” at the top of this thread “proof,” and do you plan to cite to it as “proof” in the future? I think I’ve discovered your problem. You think citing to someone who hasn’t done their homework completes your homework.