It wasn't an "argument" (here I go with the English lessons, again). It was a response to your claim that I "refused" to read your "evidence." Your claim was crap when you said it the first time, remained crap when you continued to say it, and will be crap from now to eternity.
And all you posted to “refute” what I posted was your opinions, and your conjectures.
You posted absolutely NOTHING of any substance to show that the argument I put forth, backed by various and multiple documents and actions taken, official and corporate, is more than substantiated and credible.