Why don’t you start by attempting to explain away what the documents clearly state?
Why don’t you post something which refutes any of this besides your personal opinions?
Why don’t you post something which could lead one to credibly believe that the U.S. government is not incrementally positioning itself to align with the goals and agenda set forth in Pastor’s Building a North American Community.
I’ve shown you how it is. Post something, besides your opinions, which could lead one to believe anything but what a sane person could.....that this government is positioning itself to NAU goals.
After a rather extended foray into red-herring territory, i.e., your insistence that I allegedly "refuse" to look at the evidence, we have now arrived at the stage where you think you've posted "evidence." I place the word "evidence" in quotation marks because I have a more [ahem] conservative understanding of the word.
So here we are. I am looking for evidence that George W. Bush has an insidious plan to create the NAU. If his "plan" is being undertaken with other "gobalists," as you suggest, then it can correctly be described as a "the conspiracy to create the NAU" (in the future, just "the conspiracy").
Now we come to your comment #155 (that you thought I "refused" to read the first time it was posted, you think, in 2006). Your confusion (again, predictable) stems from my observation that you haven't posted evidence of the conspiracy at all. Let's take your first three examples (that I pick simply because they are the first three--if you wish to discuss the others you'll need to point to which specific ones you care to discuss, and how they represent the evidence you claim they represent). The first is a joint statement by the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Nope, no evidence of conspiracy to create the NAU there. The second is a link to the SPP's website. No evidence of the conspiracy there, either. The third is a link to paper written* for a thinktank. Evidence of what, exactly? God only knows, since you won't tell us.
The important lesson you should take from this exchange is that, on a conservative website, folks tend to be sceptical of outlandish claims, and look askance when others fail to deliver evidence that they are true. Hours ago, (days? was it even on this thread?) I gave you examples of the cooperation (under the SPP) between Canada, Mexico, and the United States. They included work on preparing for an outbreak of avian flu, standardization of civil aviation beacons (which Corsi yowls about in his latest "advertisement" for his book), telecommunication standards, and energy. One would expect that you could explain why the above are evidence of the conspiracy. Instead, you give me what amounts to a document-dump with no commentary. It's tiresome.
_____
*Even Pastor has stated he does not wish to see the borders between Canada, Mexico, and the United States dissolved, insisting that he simply wants to see more "cooperation." I don't care what he says either way, but it was humorous to see the usual suspects on this website portray the statement as more evidence of, you guessed it, the conspiracy.