Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DJ MacWoW
You find her attractive so you're all for continuing to let her ignore the terms of her probation.

actually no.....my ideal would be more Monica Belluci but I am quite happy with my wife I have...extremely happy actually

Her drinking, drugging and promiscuous behaviour does not occur in a vacuum

the promiscuity has nothing to do with this unless it's while driving

Again she is not my cup of tea but many of you gals here seem more obsessed with her looks and tawdry behavior than the men here are....not surprising I guess

but....my wife(42), oldest daughter(18), mom(75) all think she is being singled out for being rich, bratty and pretty to some...what region are all you gals on this thread from?

You're right about one thing....being a subjective man, I would be much harder on Rosie. Hilton has not done near enough mouthing off like Rosie to invite my visceral disgust.

777 posted on 06/09/2007 4:11:54 PM PDT by wardaddy (on parole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 751 | View Replies ]


To: wardaddy

Wow. You got it all figured out, don’t ya. Perhaps Paris’ life is so out of control that she needs this judge to slow down her descent so she can regain some semblance of a normal life. I hope she can manage to do it. While I deplore the media frenzy, I applaud the judge for trying.


783 posted on 06/09/2007 5:01:20 PM PDT by tioga (Fred Thompson for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy
but....my wife(42), oldest daughter(18), mom(75) all think she is being singled out for being rich, bratty and pretty to some...what region are all you gals on this thread from? First of all, it isn't just "gals" who were applauding Hilton's return to custody. Every radio host on my local conservative radio station (all men) were applauding -- more gleefully than anything I've seen here. My husband, like you, prefers voluptuous, sexy Italian brunettes. Since I happen to be one of those and I only care what my husband thinks, I don't envy Hilton's looks in the slightest. Where am I "from"? Not sure what that has to do with the subject, but here goes: I was born in Maine and spent most of my life in the Southeast -- Florida, Alabama and Virginia. I attended college in Los Angeles. Incidentally, USC is probably the official headquarters of spoiled, rich, blondes. It is referred to as the "University of Spoiled Children." Believe me, if I had a problem with people like Hilton, I sure as heck wouldn't have attended USC. After graduation, I moved to Seattle and lived there until we moved to the Midwest 3 years ago.

Hilton isn't being singled out for being rich or pretty. If by "bratty" you mean showing contempt for the law, then, yes, she is being singled out for being "bratty".

"Hilton has not done near enough mouthing off like Rosie to invite my visceral disgust." OK, but, as the father of daughters, who do you think is more harmful to young girls? I don't know a single little girl that admires or emulates Rosie O'Donnell. I know plenty, including my nieces, who idolize Hilton and vapid bimbos like her. I am greatly concerned about the shallow, materialistic, slutty, self-destructive and vapid trends that are popular with young women these days and I am, honestly, thankful that I only have sons.
784 posted on 06/09/2007 5:17:14 PM PDT by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy; Netizen
the promiscuity has nothing to do with this unless it's while driving

It speaks volumes about her character, or rather, lack of it.

all think she is being singled out for being rich, bratty and pretty to some..

If it was Rosie that fulfilled NONE of her probation requirements and even knowingly violated them, would they claim she's being singled out for being a lesbian? Would you be defending Rosie?

This was posted by Netizen:

Driving on a Suspended License in California

Vehicle Code § 14601 makes it a misdemeanor to drive with a suspended license in California. This includes out-of-state drivers whose privilege to drive in California has been revoked. To establish this offense, the prosecution must prove three elements:

1. The person drove a motor vehicle;
2. The person’s driving privilege was suspended or revoked; and
3. The person knew his/her driving privilege had been suspended or revoked

The key element for the legal defense of driving on suspended license cases is the “knowledge requirement.” The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the driver knew his license was suspended. (remember that for her first DOSL she signed a statement saying she was told NOT to drive) The prosecutor usually relies on DMV records to show that a notice of suspension had been mailed to the driver prior to the date of arrest. But given the tendency of mail to get lost or overlooked, jurors rarely find this evidence sufficient to meet the prosecutor’s heavy burden in a criminal case. Penalties for Driving With a Suspended License in California

Driving on a suspended license is a misdemeanor offense and punishment may include probation, jail time and substantial fines. Penalties in a given case depend on (1) the reason the license was suspended and (2) whether the defendant suffered prior convictions for driving with a suspended license. Generally, penalties are higher if the license was suspended or revoked because of a DUI conviction, a vehicular manslaughter conviction, or a finding that the driver is a habitual traffic offender.

http://www.southern-california-dui-defense.com/driving_without_license.html

Driving When Privilege Suspended or Revoked 14601. (a) No person shall drive a motor vehicle at any time when that person’s driving privilege is suspended or revoked for reckless driving in violation of Section 23103 or 23104, any reason listed in subdivision (a) or (c) of Section 12806 authorizing the department to refuse to issue a license, negligent or incompetent operation of a motor vehicle as prescribed in subdivision (e) of Section 12809, or negligent operation as prescribed in Section 12810.5 , if the person so driving has knowledge of the suspension or revocation. Knowledge shall be conclusively presumed if mailed notice has been given by the department to the person pursuant to Section 13106. The presumption established by this subdivision is a presumption affecting the burden of proof.

(b) Any person convicted under this section shall be punished as follows:

(1) Upon a first conviction, by imprisonment in a county jail for not less than five days or more than six months and by a fine of not less than three hundred dollars ($300) or more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).

http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d06/vc14601.htm

what region are all you gals on this thread from?

I live in liberal land and just got back from Shoprite. Hubby started a conversation at the checkout with a lot of under 30 girls (4 or 5 of them). Everyone said Paris deserved her sentence. Everyone.

796 posted on 06/09/2007 7:13:32 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson