To: areafiftyone
I applaud Rudy for his assertions that he will nominate strict contructionist judges like Scalia and Roberts to the Supreme Court - judges who contributed to the just-announced decision upholding the ban on Partial Birth Abortion.
I also applaud Rudy for his statement that he personally disapproves of abortion.
16 posted on
04/18/2007 12:23:53 PM PDT by
Ciexyz
(Is the American voter smarter than a fifth grader?)
To: Ciexyz
:-)
To: Ciexyz
I also applaud Rudy for his statement that he personally disapproves of abortion. that was after he said he'd drive his daughter to get one? i applaud rudy being honest that he believes in a woman's right to choose and that he realizes that he will lose most of the prolife vote because of it.
23 posted on
04/18/2007 1:05:06 PM PDT by
xsmommy
To: Ciexyz; areafiftyone; Spiff; wagglebee; narses
I applaud Rudy for his assertions that he will nominate strict contructionist judges like Scalia and Roberts to the Supreme Court - judges who contributed to the just-announced decision upholding the ban on Partial Birth Abortion. Slight problem. Anyone who thinks abortion is a Constitutional right that should be publicly-funded, while advocating for the national regulation of our RKBA (which IS an infringement of a Constitutional right)...well, that person's promise to appoint "strict constructionists" rings hollow (particularly if he thinks a strict constructionist could come down either way as regards to Roe v. Wade. How does that work out?).
I also applaud Rudy for his statement that he personally disapproves of abortion.
Doesn't the fact that practically all Pro-Choice people are "personally against abortion" render this point moot?
43 posted on
04/19/2007 4:51:32 AM PDT by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson