You raise MANY appropriate questions. I’m only responding to one, “Birthdrugs may not be testable in a baby six months old, but both the nannies claim the baby ws routinely drugged thru Dec ‘06. Has a hair/nail test been done on the Baby since LB got visits? Why not? Why no court order? Wouldn’t it be beneficial to do it now, before returning to the USA pediatrician? (time for drug to disappear) Sense of ‘urgency’”
Yes indeed there should be a sense of urgency since DL is in the continual presence of a person, HKS, who is engaged in a defacto co-parent-ship with LB. HKS is of concern b/c he is 1) a person with probable drug addiction problems (based on all KE’s prescriptions for him back in Jan, he should have to prove that at this point he’s clean);he is (2) a prime person of interest in an inquest where one person died of drug OD; he was (3) the manager or S.O of the child’s mother at the time of her death from unclear overdosage circumstances; and who has (4) been implicated in the previous drugging of the said child.
Also there is urgency b/c there is the likelihood of time and possibly HKS destroying any evidence of DL’s having received drugs. At this moment DL’s hair and nails are now almost 6mos out from the nannies’ alleged drugging.
If HKS were to shave DL’shead - could use the excuse of lice (?), the hidden follicular hair, as a repository of drug evidence, would only date back 2-6 weeks (from follicle to scalp). In that case, without the long growth, a sample after today (if for example he shaved it today)would only reveal what drugs DL might have been given from approximately April 1 forward. Similar for nails, but an even shorter time frame, infact her nail ends - the parts that are trimmable are probably a manifestation of what was going on 3-6 mos ago at this point and it will get more and more useless after this point in time.
That brings up another question I have. What if HKS, Larry, and DL return to CA and live together (or not live together but HKS is still in DL’s life), what would happen if drugs were found in her system? What if HKS had babysat DL for a night and then he left town for a week? And during that time, someone alerted CPS that Dannielynn was ‘being given’ or ‘exposed’ to drugs, and when they tested her it was positive! Did HKS give her drugs during a very random and short-term visit with her or did Larry give her drugs (and therefore, he probably DOES on a regular basis)???
This is just ONE of the MANY REASONS that I would NEVER have HKS around Dannielynn, if I were Larry!!!!!!!!!!!!