[blueplum]

there was a strong likelihood it would have been or at minimum a reason to remove the child to LB’s custody temporarily with her having only visitations. The children’s social services do it all the time......The state collects quite a bit of money on each drug baby they can remove.

For the sake of everyone's eyes, I'm going to answer your post in 3 parts, that way I won't get eggs thrown at me for hogging an entire page lol

If CPS removed children from the home of all parents taking RX painkillers (or "tying one on", on a Sat nite), or solely on the 'suspicion' of a jilted boyfriend or ex hubby or snoopy neighbor, there would be no children left in homes anywhere in America.

In California, CPS does NOT, take, newborn babies that test positive for illegal drugs. They used to, or threatened to, but quickly realized that policy did nothing but prevent mothers from seeking prenatal/medical care. And Anna's Methadone wasn't illegal.

I seriously don't know why, Anna was afraid to have her baby in California. Unless [someone] intentionally led her to believe....they took babies.

[Kimberly GG]

“I seriously don’t know why, Anna was afraid to have her baby in California. Unless [someone] intentionally led her to believe....they took babies.”

Perhaps it has something to do, instead, with the rumor that Virgie had already hired O’Quinn and was seeking custody earlier than we thought, due to Anna’s drug usage, or shortly after Daniel’s death, for fear that something would also happen to DL? As I said earlier, I read that this could be the reason for the snarling and statement “bring it on, mommy” in that video.