Question for discussion/thoughts: The nannies, or at least one of them, said that Daniel went out for a ride with Howard at some point after Daniel arrived at Anna’s hospital room. They said they knew that because Anna had told her/them, at the house, after Daniel died.
If Anna did lose her memory of that night and the morning Daniel died, as she herself said in an interview and it’s reported she said the same to the police, how could Anna have told a nanny what happened if she had no memory of it?
I know some of you will say that Anna was lying about her memory loss, but I’m taking it at face value, as she did suffer tremendous trauma when Daniel died, and I read somewhere that doctors have said sedation with certain drugs, such as Versed, can cause memory loss in these situations. I have no reason not to believe that doctors present deemed it necessary to sedate Anna right away, or that she was sedated thus simply because Howard may have told the doctors to do so. I believe the doctors present made the determination. These are things I want to hear about at the inquest, among many others.
It’s also odd that the nurses and others at the hospital didn’t see Daniel leave with Howard - they only saw Howard.
I think, for whatever reason, it was Howard who told Anna that Daniel had gone with him, when she didn’t remember “details” of that night, post-trauma.
That way, whatever happened to Daniel “could’ve” happened when Daniel “left the room/hospital” and the cause of death wouldn’t be confined to just the contents of the room, if you see what I mean.