To: windchime; All
Well, now that's a very interesting statement from Virgie's attorney.
Awhile back, I posted that I had read somewhere that the reason for Anna's 'bring it on, mommy' statement....might have been because Virgie had hired an attorney and filed for custody of Danielynn after Daniel died, but BEFORE Anna died and Anna was none to pleased, resulting in that seething video.
From windchime's post:
"UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: As you will note from the record, my client applied for custody as of day one . Then her daughter died , and there were no definitive person of the father. She was the only known relative of Dannielynn, undisputable."
Virgie applied for custody of Danielynn BEFORE Anna died. Am I reading that correctly?
10,526 posted on
05/04/2007 11:04:53 AM PDT by
Kimberly GG
(DUNCAN HUNTER '08.....lframerica.com.....MARCH TO TAKE BACK AMERICA)
To: Kimberly GG
I thought Rose had misspoken on the time, but that may not be the case. Hmmmm.
10,528 posted on
05/04/2007 11:07:52 AM PDT by
windchime
(I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT)
To: Kimberly GG
“””””Virgie had hired an attorney and filed for custody of Danielynn after Daniel died, but BEFORE Anna died and Anna was none to pleased, resulting in that seething video.””””
WOW!- if that is true then Virgie was trying to do what some posters have suggested she should have done - get Dannielynn away from the drugged up Anna and HK$.
I expect they will acknowledge Virgie tried to do the right thing but add “for the money”
JMHO
10,530 posted on
05/04/2007 11:11:15 AM PDT by
sodpoodle
( Despair - man's surrender. Laughter - God's redemption)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson