Please check my post #10,495. Can we reconcile my memory of her testimony, and your post here? I don’t think we are way far apart. In my post I was replying to the assertion that Virgie denied a relative of hers did “this” when testifying, then told Greta differently last night. And I don’t thing Virgie did THAT.
Thanks, TexKat!
I just got back and am glad I started reading from most recent. TexKat has provided what Virgie said in posts #10,499 and #10,500.
IMO only . . . the problem is that Virgie responds different ways at different times - then sometimes changes the response within a testimony/interview.
IMO again . . . if she’s OK with selling photos that she’s taken or are in her posession, then it shouldn’t be a problem for anyone else. BUT, the inconsistencies do cause me to question her veracity.
I do remember her testimony about her sister-in-law and she did not deny her SIL made money with the gravesite video, but as you said, did deny any knowledge of how much her SIL may have made and said she had nothing to do with it. In the Greta interview, she said no relative has made money, so that is in direct contrast with her testimony. I’m still bothered by her saying she sold pictures of Daniel, and whether it was before or after his death, it still bothers me.