Replies

If you are really that interested, why don't you do some research on Maddox? Also, the rumours of corruption are starting to pile up around the latest purchase. Since you've given credentials in your posts, I am sure that you are far more aware of the possibility of corruption in both cases. Corruption, American style, is exactly how much money did she get paid for those People photos and also, why did she take the boy away so quickly when he cannot understand her or the nannies? Press deadline, is my guess.

Angelina Jolie is deranged, IMHO. She is collecting children just like kooky Mia Farrow, who also got away with it because of celebrity. The big difference between the two cases is that Mia's kids are American by birth, except for her adoption with first husband Andre Previn, and that would be her daughter, Mrs. Woody Allen.

Young girls look at this woman for her beauty and emulate her style. She is not married to the doofus she stole from another woman, she already has expressed disappointment in her illegitimate natural child, and she makes big bucks when she buys every kid. She looks like a ghetto billboard with all of her tattooes, she has been treated several times for drug addiction, and she tried to kill herself years ago when her lesbian lover refused to "marry" her. This is what the MSM exalts, and this is what young girls want to be like, and why they think they can do such things. It's OK because the world loves Angie for her outrageous actions.
I can't stand Paris, Lindsay, or Nicole either, but at least they are not dragging children through their skanky dirty lives. I think Brittney was condemned so strongly because she does have children, and then there is the ANS lowlife circus that will not end. By far, the worst of the whores who inhabit CelebLand is scary phony, Angelina. People believe that BS and it is a shame.

If you are really that interested, why don't you do some research on Maddox? Also, the rumours of corruption are starting to pile up around the latest purchase.

I'm not going to engage in your little vendetta, because my point was that problems and corruption in the Cambodian and Vietnamese adoption processes far preceded Angelina Jolie ever setting foot in either country.

That's the reality, that's the truth, and if you can't accept it, it makes the rest of your points simply not credible.

I am greatly familiar with Vietnamese adoption practice, don't need to study it much more than I already have.

The boy was an orphan under Vietnamese law, and under any examination using common sense.