Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: angkor

The mother is rotten but Jolie may have no good choices. She should consider actually giving the child back, only with a monthly allowance at some grocery store -- sort of like food stamps -- so that the child is always provided for. And she could send clothing and pay for schooling and healthcare. That sort of thing. But not one dime should be spent on that mother. Not one red cent. If the mother is not interested in the child, she will give him back. At least the child will have physical needs met.


11 posted on 03/27/2007 8:55:06 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
She should consider actually giving the child back, only with a monthly allowance at some grocery store -- sort of like food stamps -- so that the child is always provided for.

The mother will do what the welfare deadbeats here do; cheat the child somehow, even as far as *buying* the food and selling it and the clothing on the black market for her own habit.

41 posted on 03/27/2007 2:44:45 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson