Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog
No -- IF it happened again, I'd take the case.

It would be the fault of the owner of the horse for continuing to let people ride it, assuming it happened again and the rider was not informed of the horse's history.

Again, IF it wasn't a typical "horse shut off" case and there was some evidence that the horse deliberately jumped onto the guy. (Doesn't take much.)

I don't mind horses that shut off as much as I mind horses that rear, though. If one makes a habit of that I strike him off my list. Too dangerous.

94 posted on 03/22/2007 11:36:07 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: AnAmericanMother; CindyDawg

You're going to decide a horse deliberately jumped on the guy when he wiped out a fence?

CindyDawg... Update: I'd let that stallion on my place but I won't allow any lawyers. ;~)


97 posted on 03/22/2007 11:41:31 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson