Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog

Oh yeah I'm sure it's for the rush...but why is it any different then say standing on a horse?

Both are dangerous, both potentially can cause a horse injury, why is one justifiable and the other not...

I'm realize riding horses, in and of itself is dangerous...my puzzlement tho is why take the danger element to the very limit...that's what I don't get. But I guess the line is different for everyone, and that's OK, just a rambling thought:)

Becky


33 posted on 03/22/2007 9:44:04 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Oh yeah I'm sure it's for the rush...but why is it any different then say standing on a horse? Both are dangerous, both potentially can cause a horse injury, why is one justifiable and the other not...

Well... one of them is an art form, and one of them is just goofy showboating :~)

42 posted on 03/22/2007 9:51:07 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson