Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: justthinkin

Not sure what to say to all that. I am not, I repeat NOT an expert on all things ANS and do NOT pretend to be.

I didn't know if the times I saw her on the TV news here were in 2001 or 2005. I did brush up on this when Daniel died and plowed through all the hundreds of pages of Marshall v Marshall, then the banktuptcy and SCOTUS proceedings - but I did not commit them to memory.

Howard K Stern's reprimand may have made the news here, but it did not penetrate my brain in any way, shape or form at the time, if it did. I'm not even sure how I knew who he was at the time of Daniel's death. Probably just repeated exposure over the years and osmosis. I have paid little to no attention to Anna Nicole Smith before these mysteries happened, which intrigued my curiosity.

So, I don't know when ANS met HKS - I only know that stalkers like HKS always try to puff up their relationships to their stalkees - and the stakes are high in this one. His length of time "in her service" has been streeetttcched and streettched every time it comes up.

I said from all the notes I had gathered, it appeared to me it was around 1996. Then Stern himself said 1996 in the hearing, so that's good enough for me.

It fits with the time she was trying to get somebody, anybody, to take on her bankruptcy case for free because she was down and out. He was doing a record label negotiation with a small-time band at the time, that's all. It fits with her begging people to take her case.

Beyond that, I don't know. I have all those same notes you posted, plus many pages more - and most here said they didn't want to know anything about the Marshall cases. *bor - ing*

They either have to be in detail or not at all - because we've all seen how messed up the media has gotten it in relation to Dannielynn and her "inheritance." Some people still insist that Daniel had a trust fund from JHMII and it should go to Dannielynn, from ANS getting it at Daniel's death. No Daniel trust fund is ever mentioned anywhere in those court papers - and virtually every other thing on the planet is discussed, financially.

I don't know what else to say. I gathered a bunch of notes and then posted a Case Name List, which I try to keep updated. I'm not trying to be an expert - I'm trying to save fellow posters from having to duplicate the efforts or spend mountains of time looking things up without a roadmap. I'm homebound and have the time and some familiarity with parts of this, plus did newsgathering for a living for many years.

Please keep posting and I'll try to keep my mouth shut - I don't post a whole lot, anyway, except in spurts when I feel well enough to do it. Thanks for your serious look at the Marshall stuff.

I thought it was 2005, since that's the date I copied off of it, but logically, it had to have been in 2001. I'm old and years run together, 2001 is the same as 2005 to me.


9,601 posted on 03/23/2007 11:20:29 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9585 | View Replies ]


To: Rte66

You are a terrific researcher and resource here. And i, for one, appreciate it very much. I'm too lazy to do what you do.


9,837 posted on 03/24/2007 7:58:06 AM PDT by uncitizen (Ya mean i'm gonna have a mushroom trip?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9601 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson