[Freedom'sWorthIt]

That article also included this statement:

"Nothing unusual was observed on hotel surveillance tapes, and there was no evidence to suggest a crime occurred, he said."

If later reports are true, we know that opinion by the police obviously changed from their initial review of the hotel surveillance tapes.

[uncitizen]

"Nothing unusual was observed on hotel surveillance tapes, and there was no evidence to suggest a crime occurred, he said."

If later reports are true, we know that opinion by the police obviously changed from their initial review of the hotel surveillance tapes.

Yes, or they were putting out the signal to the perpetrators that "we've gotcha!"

But if that were the case why did the police not tell Judge Seidlin about it?