I liken my position/thinking to Greta Van Susteren's. I couldn't believe O'Quinn , as an attorney, said what he said in accusing Stern of murder. Sometimes I'm a bit puzzled by folks coming up with all the conspiracy/premeditation theories surrounding Danny's and Anna's deaths. It's kinda like Bush Derangement Syndrome:) I'm not talking about we on this thread alone, but those on all the other message boards, too. Not that I myself haven't prejudged people at times. I have. Sometimes it's real hard not to, and my imagination is as active as anyone elses!
We just have to wait for Perper's press conference and any police press conferences/statements, and go from there. At that time, we'll have more real "meat" to speculate on.
I really think O'Quinn is seeing a pay off. That being said I really believe that Virgie thinks that Howard killed Daniel and Anna. Initially she may have suspected Daniel but with Anna dying the way she did and taking into account all of the deals Howard has done I think that is where she is coming. We're all speculating and we don't have a dog in this fight. That doesn't go for Virgie. She's lost a grandchild and a daughter and believes the man who is responsible is Stern. O'Quinn could be feeding off of that and using it to his advantage.
I've always followed celeb gossip. I can tell you that people have never trusted Stern or Anna. When Stern announced he was Dannielynn's father hardly anyone bought it. I must admit I do like the term Stern Derangement Syndrome...LOL. We need a list of symptoms people...
Agree that O'Quinn sounded like he was not all with it on Greta's show last night. But, we know that Virgie has made these accusations of Stern - she made them (re: Daniel's death) on national TV so O'Quinn calling Stern a "murderer" as Virgie's attorney is, actually, understandable. To me anyway.
Virgie also warned Anna that she could be next. That she was in danger. And, guess what, Virgie was right. She was the ONLY one who was right. She may not be politically correct. She certainly isn't refined. But she lost her grandson and her daughter who were both in the presence of Stern within 5 months of each other, both relatively young, and Daniel not known to be on drugs, yet he had methadone enough in his system to kill him.
Conspiracy theories? I haven't uttered one word about a conspiracy theory. It isn't a conspiracy theory to believe that Howard Stern is a murderer. He had motive, he had means, there was a pattern in which he had opportunity to kill both of them. (Guess what star witness is now not there to testify in the upcoming inquest into Daniel's death?)
Sure we have to wait for the rest of the revelations to come from the ANS autopsy. And we have to wait for the results of the police investigation.
When Michael Peterson's wife (in Durham, NC) (not related to Scott Peterson) died - after seemingly falling down their steps and dying from her injuries there - after hearing just the initial facts in that case - I knew she had been murdered by her husband. Why? Motive, opportunity, and things that didn't add up in the initial news story.
Same thing with OJ's murder of his ex wife and her boyfriend. The "official" ruling in that was OJ didn't kill those two people. That does not mean he didn't. That just means that jury said he didn't. Sometimes the "official" proceedings do NOT come out with the truth or justice.
That is all I'm interested in..... Truth on all counts and justice for Stern if he did, as I believe, murder these two people.
He may still "officially" get away with it. He is very slick. And he has important friends in the legal and celebrity world and in the Bahamian government.
So, at this point, I am waiting for the "official" reports to come in.
I am waiting for Stern to finally agree to the DNA test for this baby since he should have no fear of that event if he is, as he has proclaimed, the biological father of the baby.
I am waiting for the Bahamian courts to evict Stern from the house he has been squatting in so Stern has to actually find a way to either live elsewhere in the Bahamas or go back to the States....and maybe even WORK for a living.
I am waiting for the autopsy report and after that is announced, want it to be reviewed by a board of impartial experts. In fact I want Anna Nicole re-autopsied. When murder is a possibility, I think it's that important to be totally SURE of what any clues showed from the pathology reports.
Do I trust Perper? No.
I am waiting for the police investigation to charge Stern with premeditated first degree murder in both deaths....but realize they have to have very good evidence to do that. So, I will settle for 2nd degree murder. Negligent homicide could be acceptable if they cannot prove his active murder of Anna but not acceptable in Daniel's death.
Sorry for the rant.....but it's been pent up in me all day...