Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: stlnative
Howard is objecting to DNA testing based on the lack of evidence presented to the court by LARRY BIRKHEAD. He claims there is no evidence that Larry is the father, at least none so far that has been submitted to the Bahamian court. Howard's team believes the judge violated the statute pertaining to DNA collection because Larry didn't sufficiently rebut Howard's presumption of paternity. To secure the paternity test, they're making a case that Larry must first offer proof of evidence that he is the father, and also prove his relationship with Anna didn't end 280 days before the birth of Dannielynn.

And, he is supposed to do this -- how -- without the DNA test?

14,763 posted on 03/30/2007 9:43:32 AM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14610 | View Replies ]


To: Arizona Carolyn; Lizarde
LOL... can you believe it - they are really reaching.
As you read on Lizarde set me straight on the final UK court (Privy Council). (Thanks Lizarde)
14,789 posted on 03/30/2007 10:04:21 AM PDT by stlnative (The Queen of Spelling & Grammar Errors! - http://community.webshots.com/user/dannielynnhopebirkhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14763 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson