Okay, what Greta said was since the judge in California has on several occasions ordered ANS and the baby tested for DNA and ANS (through Ron Rales) always got out of it,but the last order was the day before ANS died... based on that and the fact the DNA has been given and is in the USA that on that basis the judge in California could suponea the DNA results to California and when/if it proves Birkhead is the father, California demands Stern turn the baby over and if he doesn't file kidnapping charges and we have extradition with Bahamas so we would have standing.
But right now it looks like Birkhead is going to give the Bahamian courts sometime to work it out.
I truly doubt that the Ohio lab would follow any destroy order from the Bahamian courts since the DNA results are now complete and out of the Bahamian jurisdiction (when push comes to shove they don't have to follow the Bahamian order since everything is on US soil). Chances are Baird was laughing all the way to the Bahamian airport with the DNA swabs.
Out of Jurisdiction was brought up very early on once it was learned that swabs where going to fly out of the Bahamas with Baird.
Also the way I see it is Larry had to pay for those tests to be done. So Birkhead will get what he paid for. The California court is going to accept the DNA results because they were taken under proper chain custody methods. All Larry has to do is get the lab to send them to the California court or have the California courts cease them from the Ohio lab. I doubt a TRO would even be needed. Also remember the argument was always that Larry was the one that had to prove he was the father of the baby, not that Stern had to prove he was the baby's father.