It's long today, but read down to the the bottom where she talks about his new attorney Lilly Sanchez.... read what all she specializes in and we get an impression of all he is potentially fighting right now.
Like many of us, she thinks Fuhrman rocks and thinks he should have his own show -- I think he should investigate this case --...
And, lastly she dropped a mini-bombshell.... Barth was considered to replace Ashley Banfield on CTV and is why she cleaned up all of a sudden.... she tested so poorly when they had her on with Ashley that day they decided she isn't the replacement (thank goodness).
Amen! I can't stand to watch Ashleigh Banfield and hear her silly giggling all the time...even when it's not funny. That would be some trade -- a giggling gooney bird for a hostile sour pickle.
Hahaha! Ashley might be just as dumb as Barfbag, but at least she isn't as reprehensible and unlikeable as Barfbag.
"Have you all read Is HKS A Murderer today?"
That a funny site, isn't it? Love the pic today.
Have you all read Is HKS A Murderer today?
A reader at ishowardsternamuderer.com made a FABULOUS point!!
If they charged him, he would fight expedition. Maybe they are waiting on him to come back to American soil!!!
Op Ed in the Bahamas:
http://ipjn.com/
Monday, March 26, 2007
Anna Nicole autopsy report: Much ado about nothing!
All the worlds a stage, and a small-town medical examiner will be strutting his hour upon it today to announce his autopsy report on Anna Nicole Smith
and then will be heard from no more. But am I the only one who thinks the Florida officials dealing with the death of Anna Nicole must be drinking (or smoking) something that induces eccentric, erratic and wholly narcissistic behavior?
First we were variously entertained and outraged by the PT-Barnum performance of Judge Larry Seidlin who spent 6 days auditioning for a TV show instead of taking 6 hours to arrive at the patently-obvious decision to have Anna Nicole buried in The Bahamas.
Then there was Judge Lawrence Korda who we thought had restored judicial knowledge, temperament and dignity to the Florida bench (by punting litigation about Anna Nicoles Will and the paternity of her baby to California and The Bahamas, respectively). Therefore, imagine our shock, dismay
and hysterical laughter when news broke last week that he was arrested for blithely smoking weed on a park bench.
Which brings me to todays media event starring Broward County Medical Examiner Dr Joshua Perper. Because who knew that Seidlin was just an understudy to Perper when it came to doing anything to extend his 15 minutes of Anna-Nicole infamy. But this is the plot twist that has the entire world now fixated on Perper.
After all, Perper had everything he needed to determine the cause and manner of Anna Nicoles death weeks ago. Yet he made himself the ringmaster in a circus of pundits speculating about foul play when he delayed his autopsy report - purportedly to consider new evidence. And, this delay has been made all the more farcical given media reports, um, er, rumors that this alleged new evidence was related to the invariably nebulous thoughts and drug solicitations Anna Nicole typed into her computer during some of her drug-induced streams of consciousness. (Thoughts, incidentally, which are probably catalogued more authentically in her two diaries that were just sold for half million dollars.)
I am not a pathologist, and Im not going to play one here. By the same token, however, Perper is not a detective and he should not be playing one on TV. But thats precisely the role hell be playing this morning when he makes his contrived-for-TV (and thoroughly-anticlimactic) announcement. Namely, that:
Anna Nicoles death was accidental. And, that she died from infections and other complications caused by the ingestion and/or injection of a cocktail of drugs, which was made fatal as much by her own carelessness as by the negligence of others, including Howard K. Stern, who failed to seek proper medical attention for her. Period!
Alas, anyone tuning to hear this wannabe detective announce murder charges against Howard K. Stern will be justifiably disappointed
.
Inquest into death of her son Daniel in The Bahamas
Of more worthwhile interest for Anna-Nicole junkies and, I suspect, far more worrisome for Stern, is the inquest into the death of her son that is scheduled to open tomorrow in The Bahamas.
The court will take testimony from a number of witnesses, including the coroner and forensic pathologists to explain the cause (an ingestion of a more lethal cocktail of drugs in his case) and manner of death (an accident due to the unexpected but fatal chemical interaction of those drugs). Indeed, I suspect the most sensational findings will be that Stern facilitated the illegal transshipment of drugs into the country and perverted the course of justice by disposing incriminating evidence after the fact. Both of which, of course, are relatively serious crimes and would land him in jail - if found guilt as charged.
After all evidence is presented (and with 20-plus witnesses scheduled to testify, this could take two to three weeks), the 7 or 9 members of the jury will present their findings to the judge - who can reject, amend or present them as is to the prosecutors. They in turn can reject, amend or prosecute based on their discretion.
Accordingly, I predict (but dont bet your kids lunch money on this) that the jury will return a verdict (by a majority) of criminal mischief against Stern with respect to the findings cited above; that he will be prosecuted; and that Stern will be found guilty and sentenced to spend a fair amount of time in our island paradise in far less accommodating confines than he has become accustomed to at the Horizons estate.