Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jezebelle

I believe you have it right as to the DNA evidence although it might have been that Meehan could not be excluded from one of the fragments, ie not a complete match. And it could have come from dander or other tiny cells that fell from him into a sample.


91 posted on 02/28/2007 9:03:58 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: JLS

It may have been dander, which I think is a type of skin cell, but whatever it actually was, it was believed to be one cell. I don't know how full the match was but, as you say, he couldn't be excluded as the source of that cell, which puts the odds of it being someone else's well into the hundred millions is my guess.

My understanding in this area is quite limited, but I do know they're able to tell the difference between a cell that is a contaminant to an established sample versus a cell that partly or wholly constituted the original sample because of the way the samples are prepared before the extraction series for testing is done and the way they're prepared for retention after the extraction series is done. It should not happen, but identifying it (to a lab worker) is really more of a housekeeping measure so that all is accounted for. Contamination plays hell with juries, though, even though it doesn't degrade the original sample.


92 posted on 03/01/2007 12:37:19 AM PST by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson