Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: abb

As I understand it, the state lab looked for DNA the simplest, and cheapest, way, and found nothing from the lax players.

Nifong then opted for a more sensitive but also much more expensive test, Y-STR testing; which revealed maybe much more than he wanted to find out--multiple DNA donors (but again, none from the players).

Someone who knows much more than I about DNA testing said he shot himself in the foot by ordering the more expensive tests; he may have been desperate by then to find SOMETHING; but instead of players' DNA all he found was more exculpatory evidence--which he didn't want and didn't turn over to the defense.


65 posted on 02/27/2007 3:58:18 PM PST by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: CondorFlight

Good summation of the point.


67 posted on 02/27/2007 4:11:18 PM PST by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: CondorFlight

I do not know for certain but it defies imagination that the State Lab could find none of this other DNA stuff. Moreover, if in fact the State Lab could not find it, then it seems to me that any crimes where the finding or not finding of DNA at a crime scene played a significant role in a prosecution would have grounds to appeal based on the lack of competence of the State Lab. This is a Catch-22 situation. This crime could make LE in (and the tax payers of) North Carolina wish that Nifong had never been born.


77 posted on 02/28/2007 4:00:05 AM PST by bjc (Check the data!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson