You have turned this, interestingly, into something it is not. People have simply commented on this particular situation, that is, some pretty young girls attacking and beating a woman in a store. Not gangbangers in a dark ally. Not machete carrying death squads in Africa.
You have made clear that you would not intervene in the case at hand (10 year olds in a store). And you have the audacity to demand people tell you what they would do with a broomstick against gangbangers?
susie
They were bangers. The oldest of them was 20. The next olldest was 16. They led the 14 y/o and the 10y/o in the attack. The risk here was that they'd turn on anyone that intervened and slit there throats. The 10y/o was just following their big sisters lead. Most of those who would jump in wouldn't have a clue, about what they are capable of, and likely to do. It would not be wise for novices to intervene in any situation like this. That's why the police were called, and it was the police that confronted and captured the gang of bloody sisters.
" And you have the audacity to demand people tell you what they would do with a broomstick against gangbangers?"
These were bangers. You don't see normal people attacking folks in stores, unless it's a day after Thanksgiving sale.