Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: maggief

Then why did Stern put that in the will?


7,722 posted on 02/16/2007 11:31:51 AM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7720 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin

So individuals claiming to be her offspring couldn't surface after her death.


7,726 posted on 02/16/2007 11:33:26 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7722 | View Replies ]

To: PennsylvaniaMom; Arizona Carolyn; Jrabbit; Lizarde; Dr. Scarpetta; A Citizen Reporter; bonfire; ...

"Anna Nicole Smith's Will is Revealed"

From Susan Candiotti...CNN


"Clouding an already murky legal scenario, some language in the will seems to exclude any of Smith's future spouses or children.

Smith's heir or heirs stand to inherit a stake in her longstanding claim to the fortune of her late husband, Texas oil baron J. Howard Marshall II.

As executor, Stern is authorized set up and oversee a trust on behalf of Smith's beneficiaries, and to make investments on its behalf.

The document could be crucial to giving Stern the legal standing to determine Smith's final resting place."



http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/02/16/smith.ruling/index.html




7,734 posted on 02/16/2007 11:37:32 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7722 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

>>>Then why did Stern put that in the will?>>>

Maybe he KNEW that and let the will issue stay as it was because after Daniel is out of the way, he 'as the baby's father' could sue through probate.


7,739 posted on 02/16/2007 11:38:28 AM PST by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7722 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson