Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: An American In Dairyland

I said "why" - not shame, but insurance for ANS and "work" considerations.

It would be "embarrassing" because she or he may have sworn at some point in some legal contracts that they did not have seizures and Wecht didn't want to be the one to tell the world about it.


16,839 posted on 02/26/2007 2:05:05 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16817 | View Replies ]


To: Rte66
I said "why" - not shame, but insurance for ANS and "work" considerations.

We were discussing possible epilepsy/seizure disorders in the context of DEAD people and autopsy reports (Dr. Wecht). Dead people don't need to worry about insurance or "work" considerations but their surviving family does have to bear the brunt of any possible shame that an autopsy brings to the fore front. That is why I mentioned "shame" in this context.

16,851 posted on 02/26/2007 2:10:21 PM PST by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16839 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson