This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 03/09/2007 9:01:03 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
Thread is getting too long for FR servers Please continue here at |
Posted on 02/08/2007 12:39:03 PM PST by kcvl
Oh my...you need to hang with a better crowd :)
The thing is we won't know the facts about her illness because the only people who know the truth - the nurse, maybe the bodyguard, the friend, and HKS himself are all under the influence of HKS. No independent source of information.
Also earlier heard that the ME mentioned the continued tests of the blood - but did not hear him say also continued tests of her tissues. Isn't it in the tissues that they can trace poisons and/or other hard to find causes of death? Even her hair is a source of information?
If they are only doing further tests on the blood - that is just not encouraging. Maybe he just was not being thorough in saying what is being tested.
I just do not have much faith in this ME.
I just watched the snippet of the interview...gag.
Wish his "interviewer" would have asked him for a copy of the marriage license for their upcoming wedding of 2/23. Could have at least proven him a liar or not on that issue.
Judge Judy says there is only ONE person whose interests we ought to be concerned with right now, and those are the baby's. And we need to make sure she gets placed in her permanent home as soon as possible.
Lifelong friends.... what can I say. We had quite the arguments over this.
The body language expert confirmed what all of us are saying here. HKS is disingenuous in his grief. She had a hard time reading ANS, didn't want to say she was druged up, but point out the eyes didn't blink at the same time and the corners of her mouth were not "normal"...
Suzy, I think you are confusing Methadone with crystal meth, 'hillbilly heroin.' Methamphetamine is what they 'cook' in those barn labs.
Interesting blog someone has put together:
http://www.ishowardksternamurderer.com/
Hannity and Colmes has Dr. Laura Schlessinger - oh off talking about Valentine's day, marriage, etc.
Earlier she was saying she hoped ANS would not be held up as an example to Americans. She had brought the loss of her son's life and now the loss of the mother of this little baby.
She votes for the baby going to an adoptive couple who are ready to provide a loving home for it.
ACR, I think HK$ first announceed he was the father, after Larry Birkhead claimed paternity. I seem to recall that right after the birth (in the couple days prior to Daniel's death) it was alleged that Birkhead was claiming fatherhood to get child support from ANS (or some kind of settlement). There was some statement (on his blog?) that no, he just wanted to be a part of his daughter's life...he wasn't after any of Anna's money. HK$ came out as the father, I think, after Daniel's death...like he (HK$) was Anna's knight in shining armor, protector. I thought at the time ANS went along with it so she would defuse the risk of losing even partial custody of DanniLynn (due to drugs; lifestyle) to Birkhead. She was still reeling from the birth and the sudden loss of Daniel and HK$ stepped in with his claim.
Gag me! Her name is Bonnie Stern - or Howie-in-drag. Yikes what a freakazoid.
She went on and on about what good friends she was with Anna Nicole, how they watched movies together and hung out together, yada yada.
However, when she went to The Bahamas last week, after ANS died, so she and her mother could do whatever it was they did with Dannielynn, that was the first time she had ever seen the baby!
And that's at the LEAST of what we would expect from someone who "loved" Anna.
IMO, Daniel's *trust* is a myth.
If Howard Marshall didn't even put Anna Nicole in his will, what makes anyone think he had his financial wizards draw up a trust for her 6-yo son?
There is/was a "Marshall Grandchildren's Trust," but Daniel is not part of that - that was for Pierce's children and perhaps the other disinherited child's children, too.
What Anna Nicole had been fighting over all this time was a non-existent "catch-all trust" that was supposedly hers. Howard Marshall had given her approx. $8 million in property, cash, cars, jewels, services - *that* was intended to be her "trust" if she invested it wisely.
Needless to say, she didn't - thus the bankruptcy that allegedly brought her to Howard K. Stern. His name doesn't appear on the proceedings before the appeals and then it is in concert with two other firms and he is not the lead attorney.
Bonnie said that everyone in L.A. turned Anna Nicole down on taking it, except her brother, of course. I don't believe that, but haven't found the documentation yet on the seminal bankruptcy filing itself to prove or disprove it.
I heard a blurb this morning on Fox News that HKS had, in fact, picked up the boat and sailed it to the Bahamas.
But I've never heard it again.
Haven't heard anything about the boat today. My question has always been - where did they get the money to buy a boat when basically Anna Nicole was broke?
and that money includes the trust fund that Anna's dead husband J. Howard Marshall willed to Daniel. Yes, theres that too. As of Daniel's death, all that money went to Anna, and if Anna died, all money goes to little Danielynn.
What piece of excrement takes pictures of the woman he purports to love dead child and sells for $650K? That alone speaks volumns about that subhuman person. And the blog points out as soon as ANS started screaming he killed Daniel in the hospital room HKS had her sedated, then took the picture and sold it ASAP because she was so drugged up she didn't know the difference... and to make matter worse claims it was to bury Daniel. There isn't even a head stone on that boy's grave yet!
We've heard about his trust from several different places... the old man liked the kid so I can buy that he wanted to guarantee him some security.
This blog scares me for the baby, the parts about him being considered the adoptive father, even if not legal because his name is on the BC.
It was rumored by the people around Virgie and the other Hogan children.
I've read summaries of all the lawsuits and probably half or more of the details (the court record of the core cases is 446 pages alone, one of the most voluminous ever produced in the 9th Circuit, at least from the OC) and there is no trust mentioned, other than the one I referenced, which has never seen the light of day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.