[happinesswithoutpeace]

I fully understand that. I have felt from day one that this case was handled like a BS political agenda.

But what is above in the article is by no means an exoneration.

[philman_36]

But what is above in the article is by no means an exoneration.
Exoneration for what? You've seen the charges, right?

[philman_36]

The charges, as I understand it, are intent to commit murder, assault with serious bodily injury, assault with a deadly weapon, discharge of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, and a civil rights violation.
Expalin, if you would, how the information in this article isn't, in your opinion of course, an exoneration.