Obviously we're looking at an ionization cloud around the central prolate ellipsoid, and yet in the upper pic the off set circle looks distinct whereas in the lower one it seems to merge with the ellipsoid as if it was one object with an offset arm. Also the axes of the 2 ellipsoids are offset from each other.
Hard to interpret from just this one picture, although I did spend one day at Walt Andrus's house(MUFON)in Sequin TX 20 years ago, looking at Billy Myers fake UFO photos. Thus one can learn to tell fakes from real photos, by shadow lines, other clues.
Would it be possible to spectrum-analyze this photo? It might help to know just what atoms are radiating, intensities and possible polarizations. Thus it might be possible to computer-model just what's going on here.
So if this one picture is all you've got, this UFO incident will quickly pass into history like millions of other UFO incidents have before it. I could EXPLAIN the whole thing to you but that's a l-o-n-g bedtime story, and it's sunday morning....
Would ionization hold true on an slow-moving object? Slow enough that the witness had time to run in the house and get a camera, come back out, focus and shoot the picture? I don't know.
The problem with trying to enhance a digital photo is that we can't be sure if we are working with an exact copy of the original frame, size-wise and resolution/pixel-wise. A RAW image would be nice to have, but how many digital cameras have that capabiltity?
Good points, imho.
Thx.