In what alternate reality? OSS vs. proprietary hasn't even come into this thread until you tried to hijack it. You really are stalking me, and creating reasons out of thin air to troll with.
You're the one with the contradictory views
I'm quite consistent. You're the one who rails against the evil Linux open source giving our technology away to the foreigners, yet gives BSD, OpenSolaris and many others a pass.
No you're not, which is why I provided a direct link to your former comments to me trying to praise OSX as "free software". If it's free software as you claim who are you to now try to complain about others making copies of it or its features? Just further proof of your endless hypocrisy and again talking in circles.
You're the one who rails against the evil Linux open source giving our technology away to the foreigners
Which you endlessly defend of course, just as you were in the link I provided. In fact in the case of OSX you've been defending the foreign hackers that distributed a crack of it's proprietary parts, making your feint concern now over someone else copying it all the more hypocritical.
yet gives BSD, OpenSolaris and many others a pass.
Because they're not "free software", they use other licenses that are known as "commercial friendly", unlike your beloved Linux that uses the "free software" license of "the father of free software" leftist whacko Richard Stallman. Don't act like any of this is new, you've been defending Linux and that scumbag for years including when you attempted to claim OSX was "free software", plus recently defending the Russian hackers that distributed cracks of the proprietary parts. To now infer something terrible was done if someone made a copy of OSX is the height of absurdity, when you've defended the Chinese renaming "Red Hat" Linux to "Red Flag" for years.