As I have told you, there are two laws in effect here. The NET Act would nail them for distributing OS X, and even without financial gain. The DMCA covers this, and requires financial gain for an act to be criminal. The Russian software company that you always bring up was selling the circumvention software -- financial gain. You gave no evidence the OS X hackers did it for financial gain.
when you attempted to trot out the "180 day rule for criminal prosecution" on their behalf
Which is part of the terms of the NET Act, which you take out of context.
So back to the beginning: Show me where I falsely cited the law or retract the statement.
Hysterical, you mean like when you lied, repeatedly for months and tried to claim Russian hackers wrote software that was in use by the US DoD as part of your defense of the criminal Russian hackers, that you only admitted months later and tried to claim was some sort of trick? It's still unknown if you posted those lies from DoD computers, which is something you've never completely denied. Either way, I know better than believe a word you say, you're an admitted liar, and you've admitted to making up lies in defense of foreign criminals, still here today trying to make excuses for them.