Prove that claim or retract it. Do not go off on another tangent or attack. I want you to actually prove this claim that I lied for once. You taking a proper cite out of context doesn't count. You simply disagreeing with me doesn't count. You actually need to show how I falsely recited the law. For reference, the two laws in question were the NET Act and the DMCA.
If you can't, then retract.
I've only pointed out your BS a dozen or more times, including direct links. Here's another one of your exact quotes defending the Russian hackers with BS (since others from Russia HAVE been criminally prosecuted for distributing the cracks and not the cracked software itself):
"Simply violating a license by not abiding by the terms (if those terms are deemed enforceable by the court) is a civil tort, not a crime, thus, no "criminals." It could be come a crime had they copied OS X itself and widely sold it"
which came from here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1724347/posts?page=119#119
Here's one of the times where this has already of course been pointed out to you, when you tried to infer that personal backups were somehow criminal, amazingly somehow instead of the Russian hackers you've been endlessly defending:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1770621/posts?page=94#94
It's all a twisted deceitful tale, since that's the only way you can halfway pull off your attempted defense of the foreign hackers that cracked OSX, yet here you are on this thread acting like someone else copying anything from OSX was somehow in the wrong.
Like I said on the other thread, according to you basically everyone BUT your foreign hacker heroes are somehow the criminals.