I never claimed that, you're the one that was defending the Russian hackers and claimed they had to have distributed OSX before it could be criminal which was a lie. Links above of course.
We're not even talking about copyright infringement or violation of the DMCA, but lack of innovation on the part of the world's largest software company.
Don't act like you don't know that's how the "free software" world works, you've only been defending it for years including claiming most of OSX was "free software", and who copies it at that point is immaterial, especially since you've been defending Russian hackers that illegally cracked the priprietary parts of OSX with endless lies for almost a year now as well.
You just said above that they copied.
you're the one that was defending the Russian hackers and claimed they had to have distributed OSX before it could be criminal
Without personal financial gain on their part, which was nowhere indicated in the article, that is true according to the law. I've cited the law for you repeatedly, yet you always ignore it. The only counter you ever seem to have is to cite a case where a for-profit software company sold cracking tools.
Don't act like you don't know that's how the "free software" world works, you've only been defending it for years including claiming most of OSX was "free software"
Back up that false claim. You always put words in my mouth. I said most of the server tools are open source, and that OS X operates on a BSD base. That is not most of OS X.