Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bone loss may rule out manned Mars mission
Flight International ^ | 01/16/07 | Guy Norris

Posted on 01/15/2007 7:39:49 PM PST by KevinDavis

NASA is studying better ways for astronauts to exercise in space after long-running medical tests on International Space Station (ISS) crewmembers revealed significant bone loss rates.

Tests indicate bone loss rates of up to 1.5% a month, "or about as much as a post-menopausal woman loses per year", says Julie Robinson, acting ISS programme scientist at NASA Johnson Space Center. The results mean that, unless bone loss rates can be countered, a prolonged Mars mission would be virtually untenable for humans.

(Excerpt) Read more at flightglobal.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: mars; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: KevinDavis
bone loss rates of up to 1.5% a month, "or about as much as a post-menopausal woman loses per year

What??? (I'm focusing on the post-menopausal women part.) Is that for women with osteoporosis? Or is that a factor of post-menopause itself? That's a pretty staggering percentage of bone loss. So, in 10 years a woman would lose 15% of her bone mass? And in 20 years, 30%?

21 posted on 01/16/2007 9:32:19 AM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiKev

How about a new form of propulsion to get there faster? I saw a piece on NASA TV on former astronaut Franklin Chang-Diaz. He's working with a team to develop an ion propulsion system to be used on such a manned trip. As far as bone loss is concerned, the studies of long stay astronauts and cosmonauts would give a good indication. Cosmonaut Sergei Krikalev holds the record for total time on orbit at 800+ days. Him and Dr. Valery Polyakov are two prime subjects. Polyakov spent 14 straight months in orbit aboard Mir. He did it to find out the lasting effects of such prolonged weightlesness.

A better propulsion system would go a long way to help humans go a long way faster.


22 posted on 01/16/2007 7:54:34 PM PST by NCC-1701 (To boldly go where no FReeper has gone before. Live long and prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701

The problem with getting there faster is that you have to accelerate to a faster speed and then decelerate again from that speed. At lower speeds, aerobraking into the atmosphere is feasible, at higher speeds you need to carry extra propellant which means larger engines which means more propellant, ad nauseum.

I think artificial gravity is the way to go. Just spin her up really good at 1 or 2 rpm and you're all set.


23 posted on 01/16/2007 7:59:03 PM PST by AntiKev ("No damage. The world's still turning isn't it?" - Stereo Goes Stellar - Blow Me A Holloway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson