Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: txrangerette

I doubt it is Mangums attorney, if she has one, that made up that pack of lies. It is just tries to explaim away too many of Nifong's problems to be from Manugm's attorney in my view.

Also Nifong is the one already facing Bar charges. I doubt any other attorneys in NC want to join him.

Now I guess some non-attorney handler of hers might be stupid enough to try this. But the problem is Nifong and company handle what she says that makes it into discovery. They could have just ignored this statement. They went to her a few days after the 15 December hearing to get her to make a statement so they could drop the rape charges. They were hoping that by dropping the rape charges they could make the DNA less important. So they had control of what she said. They determine what part of what she said made it on the record.


507 posted on 01/12/2007 7:19:37 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies ]


To: JLS

I appreciate your thoughtful reply.

I think someone is TRYING to help her save something intact for a post-no trial outcome.

That someone has an impossible task, but it would not stop some lowlife from trying. Perhaps it isn't an attorney but one trying to act as if they are, hoping to get some $$ eventually from what they HOPE she might get. As I said, either from a book or from an out-of-court settlement in a civil suit.

At the same time, I don't deny that Nifong is in charge of allowing something to be in or out of her statements for the public record. I just doubt if he is the one forming this stuff across the board before she comes out with it. Could he in some specific aspect as he thinks it might help his problems with this case? Yeah.

But not the overall. If you look at the overall, they're gonna get nothing from RS in terms of turning him and making him a witness. Nothing happened and they both know it. And Nifong has to know that taken together her statements are ludicrous and must not be put forward in a trial.

So I see someone...whoever it turns out to be...TRYING to help her formulate SOMETHING she can cling to later on to make something out of the nothing that was her original claim of being assaulted at the party.


509 posted on 01/12/2007 7:57:51 AM PST by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!  )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson