The notion that the atmospheric condition could have caused multiple, highly trained, eye-witnesses with several hundred years of experience in aeronautics to see a spinning disc is almost certainly in dispute. So exactly who are these "multiple, highly trained, eye-witnesses with several hundred years of experience in aeronautics" you are referring to? Seems to me you're taking something in print by a liberal newsrag a little to close to undisputed fact, if in fact they even made such a claim?
I will admit, however, that the FAA official may not, in fact, eat donuts. That he's or she's a pencil-neck government droid, however, is in evidence.
Well I just so happen to work with FAA officials on a regular basis, and I'll take the word of the highly trained technical professional folks I know over the limp wristed liberal journalists at some Chicago newsrag any day.
"Well I just so happen to work with FAA officials on a regular basis, and I'll take the word of the highly trained technical professional folks I know over the limp wristed liberal journalists at some Chicago newsrag any day."
You would be insane to "take their word" in a case like this. Ask your self, if the FAA had knowledge of an such an unidentified object, would they disclose it in public? Of course they wouldn't, it would cause mass panic.
So the FAA statement adds or subtracts nothing from the wittiness accounts. Zero, Zilch... For you to suggest that it does is laughable.