And, I'm not looking for a fight, since I am agnostic on UFOs; just trying to apply logic.
I took this photo (enhanced) over Las Vegas in late July 2004, the red glow was described to me by the person who analyzed the photo as a plasma field around the object. (Note Eiffel tower, photo was taken by the pool at the Paris Hotel at 11:45 AM.)
One never knows when photo opportunities are present, we just wanted to take some neat shots of the tower when we spotted the high altitude object.
Which begs the question do people now days even bother looking at the sky for any length of time? They all have their heads buried into their texting to notice much of anything. Or they have cameras like me which have to have batteries taken out after every snap or it'll have the energy drained in 2 minutes flat.
Thank for your attitude. Much appreciated on these threads when it's not combative.
The first post got swallowed by a faulty DSL connection--evidently due to a snow storm.
1. There ARE tons photos taken. Many are available on the net.
2. It's evidently difficult to impossible to get sharp photos when they are in various operating modes . . . evidently due to inherent light bending features of their operating systems, propulsion systems . . . one can't get very sharp photos.
3. The operators evidenty have a capacity to discourage folks from thinking about taking photos--as folks on this thread have asserted experiencing and as is often reported.
4. The oerators can also evidently mangle photos in the taking effort or prevent good operation of camera equipment.