Replies

I don't see the warrant as unreasonable.

In this case probably not but I sure don't want to give the govt. a precident to perform surgery on suspects in order to obtain suspected evidence. Give them that power, and it can only lead to a very bad and dark place eventually. Sometimes it's better to let a case go than set up future generations for who knows what horrors politicians will visit upon them.

15 posted on 12/21/2006 1:24:28 PM PST by TheKidster (you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)

In this case probably not but I sure don't want to give the govt. a precident to perform surgery on suspects in order to obtain suspected evidence.

Good point. If they can do this, what's to stop them from eventually demanding that every citizen have his DNA on file?

17 posted on 12/21/2006 1:25:48 PM PST by JamesP81 (If you have to ask permission from Uncle Sam, then it's not a right)

In this case probably not but I sure don't want to give the govt. a precident to perform surgery on suspects in order to obtain suspected evidence. Give them that power, and it can only lead to a very bad and dark place eventually. Sometimes it's better to let a case go than set up future generations for who knows what horrors politicians will visit upon them.

This situation definately raises some interesting questions. What if it's not a suspect but some bystander that got popped? Do we want the right to force them to undergo invasive surgery? And what if the surgery wasn't so "safe" (btw, there is no such thing as "safe" surgery) - who makes the determination if we're going to force a suspect to undergo it?

This has the potential to set a dangerous precedent.

31 posted on 12/22/2006 5:39:45 AM PST by jonesboheim

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794