Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bad company
" He was killed after attacking someone else."

He was killed for throwing eggs at a car. He attacked no one.

" Again you refuse to acknowledge the intitating event, a crime, set forth the unfolded events."

The initiating event may have been a crime. The prank is by it's very nature simply a negligent act and it was done by a minor. The boy was throwing eggs, not bricks.

"You absolutely refuse to acknowledge that the guy in the suv has the right to travel down the road without somebodys brat attacking them."

He was not attacked. A boy threw and egg at his car and he murdered the boy for it. That's not allowed. He had the right to call the police, or hold the boy, but not murder him. Do you understand that? He had no right to murder the boy, or to use deadly force in any way.

Tell you what! I hate tough guys with guns that murder 14 y/o boys. I hate their supporters and apologists just as much. Got it?

249 posted on 12/03/2006 11:22:35 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets
I hate tough guys with guns that murder 14 y/o boys. I hate their supporters and apologists just as much. Got it?

You hate me. Got it.

Now try this on.

Leave people alone. Got it?

Teach your children to leave people alone. Got it?

Inserting your stupid self randomly into other peoples lives, destroying their personal property is a stupid thing to do. Got it?

You don't get to chose the reaction you create when you do these stupid things. Got it?

250 posted on 12/03/2006 11:35:46 PM PST by bad company ([link:www.truthout.org/docs_2006/083006J.shtml | The Path to 9/11])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson