From the link in post 3:
"There are two arcs, opposite to each other, of 82.7 each - exactly the distance between the northern- and southernmost points of sunset and sunrise from Saxony-Anhalt in the bronze age. Thus we have a mathematical clue as well that the disk belongs to the Nebra area.
The short arc in between the two big ones was on the bottom of the disk in the orientation it was found: This supports the interpretation as a "sun barge" travelling between sunset and sunrise. Another interpretation had been that we are dealing with a particularly bright section of the Milky Way.
The meaning of the two largest objects is uncertain: the Sun and the Moon or rather the Full Moon and a lunar crescent? Astronomers favor the latter view: It would have been too big an act of abstract thinking for our bronze age artist to visualize the Sun in a sky full of stars.
Seven of those stars form a tight pattern, the only one on the whole disk. While this could equally well mean the Plejades and the Praesepe star cluster or the small constellation Delphinus, preference is given to the Pleiades: In contrast to the other interpretations this asterism plays a significant role in ancient texts.
The other stars are distributed on the disk in as random a fashion as possible when one actively tries to avoid the formation of any pattern - this has actually been demonstrated by experiments at Bochum University. A true random distribution with Poisson statistics would look much more clumpy."
The meaning of the two largest objects is uncertain: the Sun and the Moon or rather the Full Moon and a lunar crescent?
-----
While the astromomers are uncertain, my theory is as good as theirs. There are countless myths and legends from all over the planet that refer to a celestial phenomenon in which Venus, Mars and to a lesser extent, the Moon were involved.
This disc might be a visual representation in artform. Makes sense if the artisans had no written language.