To: Mad Dawgg
Well we shall see, you have stated that "W" should use statesman ship and the Veto pen to hold the line on Conrgessional spending. Actually, I said that it should never come to a veto, at least where his own party is concerned. If you want to count it a victory, though, go right ahead. You win. I give. You're the biggest Dawgg on the thread.
334 posted on
11/08/2006 2:27:37 PM PST by
Oberon
(What does it take to make government shrink?)
To: Oberon
"Actually, I said that it should never come to a veto, at least where his own party is concerned. If you want to count it a victory, though, go right ahead. You win. I give. You're the biggest Dawgg on the thread." OK we shall revise your premise.
You are claiming Bush should hold the line on spending using statesmanship just like Reagan did (no vetoes at all just statesmanship) Correct?
336 posted on
11/08/2006 2:31:09 PM PST by
Mad Dawgg
("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson