Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Lieberman Effect
11/6/06 | vanity

Posted on 11/06/2006 10:25:31 AM PST by cashmere

I have not heard anyone discuss the effect that Liebermans' win will have on make-up and ultimate control of Senate. As an independent candidate what is the result when he wins his seat. Does that not remove 1 seat from the Dem side? Would they not then have to win 8 seats? Thanks for the vanity.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/06/2006 10:25:31 AM PST by cashmere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cashmere

Lieberman will caucus with the Democrats just as Jumpin' Jim Jeffords did when he became an independent.


2 posted on 11/06/2006 10:26:47 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cashmere

Holy Joe will go right back to being a rat.


3 posted on 11/06/2006 10:26:57 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cashmere

He has made no secret of the fact that he will caucus with the Dems.


4 posted on 11/06/2006 10:27:54 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cashmere
Joe is not only an independent but a "petitioning Democrat"

He will rejoin the Ds after his victory.
5 posted on 11/06/2006 10:28:10 AM PST by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cashmere
Lieberman announced early on that he would caucus with the Democrats, just as Jim Jeffords once caucused with the Democrats causing the Republicans to lose control.

I wonder if any more like Jeffords are waiting to capture their 15 minutes of fame should the either the house or senate become more evenly divided tomorrow.

Ugly, that could be.
6 posted on 11/06/2006 10:28:28 AM PST by Asclepius (protectionists would outsource our dignity and prosperity in return for illusory job security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

He's already indicated he's an "Independent Democrat" and will caucus with them.


7 posted on 11/06/2006 10:28:48 AM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cashmere
I have not heard anyone discuss the effect that Liebermans' win will have on make-up and ultimate control of Senate. As an independent candidate what is the result when he wins his seat. Does that not remove 1 seat from the Dem side? Would they not then have to win 8 seats? Thanks for the vanity.

It all depends on how he votes for leadership positions, etc.; if he votes like a 'rat, for all intents and purposes he'll be a 'rat. If it's a 50/50 Senate (or even 51/49 either way), don't be too surprised to see the GOP make Lieberman an offer of a nice committee assignment to jump parties, however.

8 posted on 11/06/2006 10:29:33 AM PST by kevkrom (John F'n Kerry's 'apology': "I'm sorry you were too stupid to realize I wasn't calling you stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cashmere

If the Dems score 50 seats, Lieberman will caucus with them and give them control. He can also get a nice Chairmanship for this move.

If the Dems score more than 50 seats, Lieberman will caucus with them and hold onto his seniority and get a decent Chairmanship and nice committee appointments.

If the Dems score less than 50 seats, then he has more incentive to caucus with Republicans, but will still likely caucus with the Dems.

If there is a miracle and the Dems do not score a pickup, Lieberman may stick it to his party and caucus with the Republicans for a good committee selection.


9 posted on 11/06/2006 10:29:53 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cashmere

Lieberamn is stilla democRAT. He has not resigned from the party. He is not presently the party's candidate for Senator.

Once 'RAT always a 'RAT


10 posted on 11/06/2006 10:32:32 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

I think we saw his true nature during the 2000 Florida "recount" sham. He is a dirty RAT who sold out any ethics he ever had to help the Democrats steal that election. He carefully twists words and omits information while he presents his "facts." Because he is sneaky and scurrilous, he is the worst type of RAT, in my opinion. He is a soulless leftist loser who would sell his own mother to help a Dem win power. Power at any cost is his mantra.


11 posted on 11/06/2006 10:33:37 AM PST by mallardx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Asclepius

One person comes to mind...

Lincoln Chaffee


12 posted on 11/06/2006 10:40:35 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mallardx
I think we saw his true nature during the 2000 Florida "recount" sham

You hit it right on the head! This is a perfect opportunity for the Connecticut Republicans to turn out in full force for their candidate and watch the Democrats split over the other two. It could make enough of a difference for us to win there.

13 posted on 11/06/2006 10:41:10 AM PST by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Asclepius

I'm interested to see if Lieberman remains pro-Israel.


14 posted on 11/06/2006 10:43:04 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
Lincoln Chaffee I can almost guarantee you that if the GOP can only win 50 seats in the Senate, Chaffee will jump to the Donks in exchange for preferred Committee Assignments.
15 posted on 11/06/2006 11:06:26 AM PST by So Cal Rocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Yep. He's sided with them on more than one occasion.

And he'll do it again.


16 posted on 11/06/2006 11:14:47 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cashmere

The MSM doesn't forecast a Lieberman win. It's not in their template.


17 posted on 11/06/2006 11:16:21 AM PST by sully777 (You have flies in your eyes--Catch-22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2; So Cal Rocket
We had already the 50/50 situation, and Chafee didn't switch party despite major efforts by the Dims to persuade him.
18 posted on 11/06/2006 1:04:49 PM PST by paudio (Universal Human Rights and Multiculturalism: Liberals want to have cake and eat it too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Things change.


19 posted on 11/06/2006 1:09:11 PM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson