Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: abb
"She hasn't spoken to authorities beyond that very first [March 20] interview that police conducted,'' Simeon said. "She's never met with the DA and has never been called back for a follow-up interview.''

snip...

"In terms of any prosecution, it's troubling when a witness who has been interviewed many times comes up with a completely new statement,'' Fairstein told ABC News. "At some point in a prosecutorial interview, she would have been asked to give them anything she knew, any scrap of information that she had.''

If she's only been interviewed once, then the law Prof. (Fairstein) is 100% off base. In fact, I'd say that the whole prosecutorial side is WAY off base - and perhaps out of their minds!

47 posted on 10/30/2006 5:52:26 AM PST by MortMan (I was going to be indecisive, but I changed my mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MortMan

And Simeon should have pointed out that at that point in time, March 20, Kim was a lot more worried about what was going to happen to her on her warrant for violation of probation than she was about somebody else's phony rape charge.


131 posted on 10/30/2006 12:44:13 PM PST by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson