Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: abb
But Nifong said hearing the woman tell her story is not the only way to determine whether she is credible. That determination comes from other, general conversations, he said.

"That's how you determine whether or not somebody's trustworthy, I think," Nifong said. "You weren't there when the crime took place, so you cannot know if the person is telling you the truth about the crime or not just based on the account."

What are these "other, general conversations?"
300 posted on 11/01/2006 4:32:04 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]


To: maggief
What are these "other, general conversations?"

They are what were called "Spectral Evidence" in the Salem Witch Trials...

301 posted on 11/01/2006 4:44:13 AM PST by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectral_evidence
Spectral evidence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Spectral evidence includes testimony about dreams and visions, accepted as evidence in court. Spectral evidence was admitted at the Salem witch trials by the appointed chief justice, William Stoughton. See also apparition.

Spectral evidence was testimony that the accused witch's spirit (i.e. spectre) appeared to the witness in a dream or vision. The dream or vision was admitted as evidence. Thus, witnesses (who were often the accusers) would testify that "Goody Proctor bit, pinched, and almost choked me," and it would be taken as evidence that the accused were responsible for the biting, pinching and choking even though they were elsewhere at the time.

Thomas Brattle, a merchant of Salem, made note that "when the afflicted do mean and intend only the appearance and shape of such an one, say J. Proctor, yet they positively swear that J. Proctor did afflict them; and they were allowed to do so; as though there was no real difference between J. Proctor and the shape of J. Proctor."

Rev. Cotton Mather argued strenuously that it was appropriate to admit spectral evidence into legal proceedings. Robert Calef published More Wonders of the Invisible World to criticize Mather for this position. (Mather sued him for libel, and had the book burned in Harvard Yard). Cotton Mather remained unrepentant for his role in the trials and the admission of spectral evidence till his death.

Rev. Increase Mather, Cotton's father, however, became an opponent of spectral evidence - though not until after the Salem hangings had taken place, and not on the basis that it was false testimony by witnesses, but that it might be a deception by demons. He published Cases of Conscience Concerning Evil Spirits Personating [sic] Men, in which he argued that "It were better that ten suspected witches should escape, than that one innocent person should be condemned".


303 posted on 11/01/2006 5:04:35 AM PST by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson