Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Durham) Prosecutor (Nifong) Yet to Interview Rape Accuser
Associated Press ^ | October 27, 2006 | Aaron Beard

Posted on 10/27/2006 12:36:17 PM PDT by Arec Barrwin

Prosecutor Yet to Interview Rape Accuser Oct 27 2:56 PM US/Eastern

By AARON BEARD Associated Press Writer

DURHAM, N.C.

The district attorney prosecuting three Duke lacrosse players accused of raping a woman at a team party said during a court hearing Friday that he still hasn't interviewed the accuser about the facts of the case.

"I've had conversations with (the accuser) about how she's doing. I've had conversations with (the accuser) about her seeing her kids," Mike Nifong said. "I haven't talked with her about the facts of that night. ... We're not at that stage yet."

Nifong made the statement in response to a defense request for any statements the woman has made about the case.

"I understand the answer may not be the answer they want but it's the true answer. That's all I can give them," the prosecutor said after the hourlong hearing.

Defense lawyers said outside court that they found Nifong's statement surprising.

"One of the most interesting things to me of course is Mr. Nifong did admit that he in fact has basically never talked to this woman and has absolutely no idea what her story is, and yet he has chosen to continue to go forward with this case," defense lawyer Joseph Cheshire said.

Nifong said none of his assistants have discussed the case with the woman either and only have spoken with her to monitor her well-being. They have left the investigation of the case to police, he said.

Attorneys for indicted player Dave Evans wrote in a letter to Nifong earlier this month that they believed he had talked with the accuser based on a court motion in which Nifong stated the woman told him she had not taken the drug Ecstasy on the night of the March 13 team party for which she was hired to perform as a stripper.

In response to a claim by a lawyer for an unindicted player, Nifong said he called the accuser to ask her whether she had used the drug.

"She said, 'I've never taken Ecstasy,'" Nifong said. "That was the extent of the conversation because that's all I had to know."

Nifong said he met with the accuser and an investigator on April 11, but didn't discuss details of the case because the woman was "too traumatized." Nifong said the woman didn't make eye contact with him and often seemed on the verge of crying. Their discussion centered around how the case would develop, he said.

"She probably did not speak 15 words during the meeting," Nifong said.

Evans, 23, of Bethesda, Md., was charged in May with rape, kidnapping and sexual offense. A month earlier, a grand jury indicted players Reade Seligmann, 20, of Essex Fells, N.J., and Collin Finnerty, 20, of Garden City, N.Y., on the same charges. The accuser, a student at nearby North Carolina Central University, told police she was raped in a bathroom by three men at the off-campus party.

The players' lawyers have strongly proclaimed their innocence.


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; durham; lacrosse; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: Arec Barrwin

I heard a poll on the radio the other day.

Seems that this idiot is on his way to a resounding victory Nov. 7.


61 posted on 10/27/2006 1:58:20 PM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

Lessee. They talked about the weather, they talked about her kids, they talked about her kids kids, they talked about his grandaddy's coon dog, they talked about the poles down at the strip joint she works at but he hasn't talked to her about the "rape"?

What is his case based on? Hastily scribbled notes taken while waiting for the next nascar race? I can't believe he's the DA.

/rant off


62 posted on 10/27/2006 1:58:29 PM PDT by Jaded ("I have a mustard- seed; and I am not afraid to use it."- Joseph Ratzinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10
There was an even worse case in Michigan, I think it was--a married woman got pregnant by her boyfriend who pressured her into accusing her husband of rape, which she did. There was zero evidence that any rape had occurred and the husband refused to admit guilt. The prosecutor was running for re-election and wanted to please the feminists. The man had no lawyer because he had resources which he couldn't touch because of a court order, but because he wasn't indigent he wasn't given a lawyer by the state. He received a long prison term which he is still serving. Phyllis Schlafly wrote a column about the case a few months ago...I remember reading about it on FR.

One of the worst travesties of justice I have heard about. With our legal system, that kind of thing can happen to anyone. At least the Duke lacrosse players haven't yet been sent to prison.

63 posted on 10/27/2006 2:06:27 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

Nifong is the accuser's attorney, and the N.C. taxpayers are paying for her "defense".


64 posted on 10/27/2006 2:11:15 PM PDT by Carolinamom ("I don't have time to be fingerpointing." ---President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy

Except that in court today Nifong confirmed that he took over as chief investigator on March 24.


65 posted on 10/27/2006 2:12:13 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

Even if the DA is "representing" the accuser, the accuser probably has her own atty as well.


66 posted on 10/27/2006 2:18:56 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (We can't be brilliant all the time but the path to conservative brilliance starts at Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

The result of this revelation means that this prosecutor has not done due diligence on the first step in a prosecution; verify the facts.

It would appear that his manner of response simply accepted, at face value, whatever the accuser said.

How can the people of the jurisdiction he works for get him out of office? As soon as they do, they need to look into the rest of the prosecutions he has handled.


67 posted on 10/27/2006 2:22:20 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

I've seen no news or reference to her having an attorney. Have you?


68 posted on 10/27/2006 2:24:53 PM PDT by Carolinamom ("I don't have time to be fingerpointing." ---President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
I've seen no news or reference to her having an attorney. Have you?

No, but not everybody is Amber Frye with a high-class, show-off atty, either.

69 posted on 10/27/2006 2:29:38 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (We can't be brilliant all the time but the path to conservative brilliance starts at Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

According to K C Johnson, North Carolina has no legal means to rein in a rogue DA except by him losing an election. (In other states the Governor, the Attorney General or sometimes the Supreme Court can do it.) If the electorate approves of the rogue DA then he's in and there's nothing anyone in government can do about it.

There's a prior thread here
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1726850/posts?page=118#118

And the one before that is full of good stuff too
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1721830/posts?page=682


70 posted on 10/27/2006 2:38:48 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

I'm recalling from way back that both the accuser and Kim Roberts have lawyers. There is no role for them in the criminal trial of the lax players, but I bet they're going to need them in their own criminal trial later.


71 posted on 10/27/2006 2:40:14 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

So when is this rogue DA up for election again?


72 posted on 10/27/2006 2:41:44 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

If she does have an attorney, wouldn't he have been w/her when she met w/Nifong?


73 posted on 10/27/2006 2:41:50 PM PDT by Carolinamom ("I don't have time to be fingerpointing." ---President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath
The accuser's former attorney...when she was arrested for stealing the taxi cab, speeding, and evading the police...has been on TV. Whether he is still her attorney or anyone else is has not been revealed...at least in any news source that I have seen.
74 posted on 10/27/2006 2:45:31 PM PDT by Carolinamom ("I don't have time to be fingerpointing." ---President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

"So when is this rogue DA up for election again?"

Nov. 7; and the polls show he will probably win. He knows his electorate.


75 posted on 10/27/2006 2:47:18 PM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

The people of the State of North Carolina should be ashamed. This is a racial prosecution to gain political favor. African Americans charged with crimes that NEVER OCCURRED would still not be under indictment. This is a wake-up call for America and North Carolina.


76 posted on 10/27/2006 2:51:32 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
The next election is November 7. And that's what this is all about.

Nifong is pandering to the local relatively poor Democrat majority black constituency in the county by falsely prosecuting three rich white Yankee Duke students. Despite the gaping holes in his case, the polls show him ahead. More on that later.

Nifong was appointed to the open DA spot by the Governor about 18 months ago. So he's never stood for election and had no name recognition. He jumped on this false claim just before the primary in May and used it to win over a challenger who was favored for having recently won a high-profile case. Since Durham is so heavily Democratic, the Republicans didn't bother with a primary and so don't have a candidate on the ballot.

The case started to fall apart AFTER Nifong won the Democratic primary. At that point he thought he was "in" as DA. However, there began to be a groundswell against Nifong, and another Democrat named Cheek collected enough signatures to get on the ballot as an "unaffiliated" (UNA) candidate. After getting on the ballot, Cheek "changed his mind" and said he would not serve if elected. It is thought he's going to get a payoff of some kind from Nifong for having squashed any other Democrat's chances to collect enough signatures. If Cheek wins, Nifong's out, and the Governor will appoint someone else as DA. Cheek is not campaigning, but has people campaigning for him under the slogan "Recall Nifong - Vote Cheek".

Meanwhile, a Republican named Monks gathered enough signatures to qualify as a write in candidate on the ballot but not enough to actually have his name appear on the ballot as UNA alongside Cheek UNA and Nifong DEM.

Instead of attacking Nifong, Monks has spent all his time attacking Cheek claiming that he, Monks, is the true alternative to Nifong because he, Monks, WANTS to serve as DA, unlike Cheek who does not. By doing so, Monks is probably helping Nifong since most Democrats in the county will never vote for a Republican.

It's pretty messed up.
77 posted on 10/27/2006 3:03:14 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

You're right about Woody Van. But I'm not talking about him. I thought she was also mixed up with a civil trial lawyer. I could be wrong. Of course, he's the wrong kind to defend her against criminal charges.


78 posted on 10/27/2006 3:05:27 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: abb

ping


79 posted on 10/27/2006 3:09:07 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy ("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

Well, you seem to be telling me that there might be something positive coming from this DA - after November 7th.

Maybe he will drop the case after the election; after he has gotten all he can get out of it - his election victory.

At least that will be positive for the defendents.

If he does that, the defendents should start a public speaking and fundraising tour for a suit against the DA for wrongful prosecution. It does not matter that he did not take it all the way to court.

They should be able to show (from the real evidence) that he (1)has for some time not had enough evidence to prosecute the case and (2)that he delayed that admission for his own political gain and (3)his false attempt to prosecute them amounted to slander by a public official.


80 posted on 10/27/2006 3:17:24 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson