Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BILL_C
How on earth do you shoot someone in the thigh inside a limosine without shooting him in the back? Especially since they are on a jump seat which is lower and closer to the front seat. helicopter? someone hiding in trees? Alien spaceship?Explain the source of the shot such as where the shooter located.
306 posted on 10/29/2006 12:25:18 PM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]


To: Shooter 2.5
How on earth do you shoot someone in the thigh inside a limosine without shooting him in the back? Especially since they are on a jump seat which is lower and closer to the front seat. helicopter? someone hiding in trees? Alien spaceship?Explain the source of the shot such as where the shooter located.

There were three bullet fragments found under Nellie Connally's seat (CE840 if my memory is correct). Let's look at the Warren Commission scenario:

Shot over limo: most consider this shot #1, could NOT have put the bullet fragments under her seat (although I can theorize a way that's never been documented before that I'm aware of).

Shot#2, Warren; The single bullet. Found intact at Parkland on a stretcher. It could not (for arguement sake, let say it probably didn't) have supplied all the mass for the left inside thigh wound on his left leg, the fragments left in Connally right wrist, the three fragments under Nellies seat.... It is a problem thinking these bullet fragments came from shot #2.

Shot #3, Warren: The bullet hit JFK in the back of his head, exited on right side as seen in the Zapruder Film. It's hard to see how bullet fragments under Nellies seat from the JFK head shot would have come from shot #3. They didn't go that way, plus there were fragments toward the front seat of the limo.

Z=325 scenario: In the shot to JKF's back, IF we believe the autopsy comments made by the FBI agent that Dr. Humme said, No point of exit, (& no bullet found) (I linked the clip to O'Neal saying that earlier, post 309, <"FBI agent describes autopsy with probe and no point of exit"> ), then something took the energy from that bullet, maybe a branch? If the shot hit a branch fired from the TSBD, then fragments in the car from that shot are a real possibility including the ones under Nellie Connally's seat and the one that hit Connally in the left leg. At Z=225 or so, we see Connally react to a something, and everybody thinks he's been shot then. I think he's reacting to a shot to ONLY his left leg. Look at the Zapruder film and watch him turn and look (slight left) and then turn around in his seat to look over his right shoulder. CE840, three bullet fragments under Nellie Connally's seat, with JOhn Connally's left leg only a foot or two to the right of where these fragments were found. Did Connally have his leg straight forward, or was it turned inside toward the left as he was turning and waving earlier. IF his left leg was turned toward Nellie Connally's seat, then it would (could) have been in a position to have been hit by a bullet fragment from a shot from the TSBD. If you analyze the 5 shots that Dr. Thomas docmented in his "ECHO CORRELATION..." paper, the first grouping of three shots had two which had to have been fired from the TSBD.

Both of the possible scenarios, The Single Bullet Theory and the Z=325 shot to Connally's back MUST explain the bullet fragments found in the car. When I saw Dr. Wecht last year, one of his questions concerned other bullet fragments that have never been addressed adequately but are somtimes metioned on later TV documentaries. It's one of the reasons that one well know JFK writer I've talked to thinks there may have been more than 5 shots. As far as the Dictabelt sounds being written off by the government, not so fast. There is compelling evidence on both sides that each side is right, but as we know, only one side will win the argument. I personally think it's valid because I'm quite sure that other evidence is clear that the last two shots were BANG-BANG, just like the Dictabelt shows.

Thanks for your comments

307 posted on 10/30/2006 5:11:15 AM PST by BILL_C (Those who don't understand the lessons of history are bound to repeat them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

To: Shooter 2.5
How on earth do you shoot someone in the thigh inside a limosine without shooting him in the back? Especially since they are on a jump seat which is lower and closer to the front seat. helicopter? someone hiding in trees? Alien spaceship?Explain the source of the shot such as where the shooter located.

Are there any tall buildings in the area? Or largish overpasses that would allow a shooter to adjust the angle at which he engaged a vehicular-mounted target?


312 posted on 10/30/2006 12:30:37 PM PST by archy (I am General Tso. This is my Chief of Staff, Colonel Sanders....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson