-- Indeed, and that's no 'excuse'. Moreover, the medical drawings were created by a highly professional medical illustrator and are so good they're sometimes confused as the original autospy photographs made public years later.
REPLY:
As the FOX special in 2003 showed quite well, the drawings shown to the Warren Commission were based on Humes memory months later, and it clearly shows the bullet going into his neck, something that just didn't happen.
We should be able to agree that the bullet to JFK's back was below his shoulder blade, whether you look at the autopsy photo relesed later that WE can now see, or the picture of JFK's shirt, the bullet hole was so low that only a fool would believe the bullet could then leave JFK's neck (hitting the top of the knot of his tie) and then have a 25 degree down angle that the bullet would have to have had to do all the wounds to Connally's body. That's why this point is so historically significant.
Now that I've shown there is a valid alternative theory to the single bullet theory, we don't have to rely on the rediculous cartoons that Dale Meyer's produced in his MSM presentations that I talked about at the beginning of my presentation to conclude that a bullet going down could then go up, and then down again. To phrase it more simply, it didn't happen and any reasonable person knows it didn't.
Now let's look at the incorrect drawing shown to the Warren Commission:
Pictures shown to Warren Commission
IMG SRC=
JFK's Shirt Showing the bullet hole well below the base of his neck
Now, let's summarize all this:
The "Professional" drawings shown to the Warren Commission were incorrect in that they show the bullet hole to the base of the neck when the shirt photo (and the earlier autopsy photo) clearly show the bullet wound to his back was well below the point shown in the "Professional" Drawing
No one could confuse this misinformation with a drawing that was professional, and based on another presentation where Arlen Specter says in a letter that he thought it was a mistake not to include the original photographs, I have to conclude "someone" else was pushing for this misinformation to be shown.
It should be clear to almost anyone now who has followed ths thread that the single bullet theory is DOA now that we have another nail in it's coffin. We have a differnent theory explaining the wounds to John Connally, specifically he was hit in the leg at about Z=222 with a bullet fragment, he turned in his seat and looked over his right shoulder, then as he is turning to look over his left shoulder JFK is hit in the head at Z=313 followed by the gunman in the TSBD firing at JFK's head, he misses JFK's head as JFK was knocked out of the way as we see in the Zapruder frames after Z=313, and the bullet instead hits Connally in the back at Z=325, driving him forward, his head collapses, and his wife Nellie pulls John over into her lap.
It should be clearer to you now that the Z=325 shot to Connally's back has been shown to be a real possiblility. But since I don't think you even believe it is a credible theory yet, I'll continue on answering the rest of your questions later.
I wouldn't consider the Z=325 scenario of John Connally being shot in the back proven until all the other wounds are explained, how the shots occurred, how the bullet hole in the front windshield (fired from the front)(etc. etc.....) actually happened.
You are witnessing (the beginning) of the destruction of the biggest lie in history, THE SINGLE BULLET THEORY.